Long-term Study on COVID Vaccines from Japan | Investigation of Nanotechnology in COVID Shots | Exploration of Cellular Toxicity for 12 Months through Longitudinal Research and Lab Culture Work
A new study, titled "Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna: A Comprehensive Longitudinal Study," has stirred controversy in the scientific community. Conducted by Dr. Young Mi Lee and Dr. Daniel Broudy, the study claims to have observed visible artificial self-assembling entities in incubated specimens of COVID-19 vaccines, suggesting the presence of nanotechnology.
The study, which can be found here, includes incubation of the vaccines and examination of their effects on blood and semen specimens. However, it's important to note that there are no credible, peer-reviewed studies or comprehensive scientific papers matching the description of a "66-page long paper" specifically titled or focused on this study's subject matter.
The findings of the study are consistent with prior research on self-assembly nanotechnology from the vaccines. The observed entities included worm-like structures, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures, and more, ranging from 1 to 100 μm in various shapes. Some entities seemed to appear and then disappear over time, with the self-assembly of artifactual structures progressing over time during incubation, becoming more complex in shape and size.
However, when it comes to the study's claims about toxicity to semen, sperm death, EMF exposure, and specific treatments, the existing literature does not support these assertions. Recent research focuses on how mRNA vaccines like Pfizer’s (BNT162b2) and Moderna’s (mRNA-1273) induce cellular immune responses in different populations, showing generally robust T cell and antibody activation without reported cytotoxicity to reproductive cells or semen in standard clinical or immunological studies.
Peer-reviewed studies published to date generally conclude that mRNA vaccines do not negatively impact sperm parameters or male fertility. No findings in high-quality literature indicate vaccine-induced sperm death or semen toxicity. Similarly, the vaccines themselves do not emit electromagnetic fields, and current vaccine safety data and studies do not involve or support EMF as a factor affecting vaccine outcomes or sperm health.
The authors of the study encourage sharing the paper widely, but it's essential for readers to approach the findings with caution and consult authoritative sources for a more comprehensive understanding of the cellular and reproductive effects of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. If you seek detailed scientific studies on the cellular immunology of mRNA vaccines or their reproductive safety, I recommend reviewing peer-reviewed immunology and fertility journals, but currently, no authoritative source substantiates the claims or the extended study features described in this study.
- The controversy surrounding the study, "Real-Time Self-Assembly of Stereomicroscopically Visible Artificial Constructions in Incubated Specimens of mRNA Products Mainly from Pfizer and Moderna," has stirred debate in the scientific community.
- The study, published by Dr. Young Mi Lee and Dr. Daniel Broudy, includes the incubation of COVID-19 vaccines and an examination of their effects on blood and semen specimens.
- The observations made in the study are consistent with prior research on self-assembly nanotechnology from vaccines, such as the presence of artificial entities in various shapes, ranging from 1 to 100 μm.
- Regarding the study's claims about toxicity to semen, sperm death, EMF exposure, and specific treatments, the existing literature does not support these assertions, and no high-quality studies substantiate these claims.
- To understand the cellular and reproductive effects of Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines comprehensively, readers are encouraged to consult authoritative sources, such as peer-reviewed immunology and fertility journals, as no authoritative source substantiates the claims or the extended study features described in this study.
