"Hawley issued a warning to the Senate GOP, expressing disapproval of potential moves to drop Americans from Medicaid within the Trump megabill."
Here's the lowdown on the senate's debates around the "big beautiful bill" - a massive legislative package with major repercussions for healthcare, taxes, and more.
Senate's Medicaid Face-off: Who Wins, Who Loses?
Senator John Thune, R-SD, has signaled he's ready to jump-start the bill's passage, even if it means rolling into the July 4th recess. But things aren't as straightforward as they seem, especially when it comes to Medicaid.
Blue State Republicans on the Edge
A small group of Senate Republicans, like Josh Hawley, R-MO, are ready to revolt if the bill trims Medicaid benefits fundamentally. Hawley's stance is clear: he won't back down if the Senate version strips benefits from his constituents, period. But his stance on Medicaid clashes with fiscal hawks who are keen on deeper spending cuts.
Trump's Medicaid Mantra
Hawley argues that lawmakers should listen to what Trump, 2020's election winner, has to say. "Why don't we just listen to the guy who won the election who said that he doesn't want any Medicaid benefit cuts," he implores his colleagues. Trump, after all, has made it clear that he doesn't want rural hospitals to close, and that Medicare should be left untouched.
The Medicaid Maelstrom: What's in Contention?
The proposed bill is chock-full of contentious Medicaid provisions: stricter work requirements, kicking illegal immigrants off benefits, rooting out waste, and more. While Hawley supports some of these changes, he's adamant about preserving healthcare access for the 1.3 million Missourians who rely on Medicaid, most of whom are working but can't afford private insurance.
Don't miss out on the latest news in the U.S. Senate! Download our app today for updates on this and other compelling stories!
Insights:
- Provider Taxes: Senators are considering lowering provider taxes from 6% to 3.5% for states that expanded Medicaid under Obamacare. This change could reduce federal contributions to Medicaid, potentially financially straining hospitals, especially in blue states.
- Work Requirements: The bill includes new work requirements for childless Medicaid recipients without disabilities between 19 and 64 years old.
- Eligibility Checks: The bill requires states to conduct more frequent eligibility checks to reduce waste and fraud, which could impact Medicaid enrollment.
- State-Funded Healthcare for Undocumented Immigrants: The bill penalizes states that provide state-funded healthcare to undocumented immigrants, which could have an impact on states with larger immigrant populations.
- The Senate's proposed legislation also includes reduced provider taxes, possibly lowering them from 6% to 3.5%, a move that, if implemented, could diminish federal Medicaid contributions, potentially burdening hospitals, particularly in states that expanded Medicaid under Obamacare.
- A contentious provision in the bill is the introduction of new work requirements for childless Medicaid recipients, aged 19 to 64, without disabilities.
- The bill additionally calls for increased rigor in eligibility checks to minimize Medicaid fraud and waste, which could potentially affect enrollment rates.
- Under the proposed bill, states that offer healthcare funded by state funds to undocumented immigrants could face penalties, a policy that might impact states with significant immigrant populations.
